Jonathan Philip Agnew
What is this nonsense between ex-cricketer Shane Warne and commentator Johnathon Agnew?
As I understand things, Warne offered Aggers a bet at the start of the tour on which bowler would take the most wickets for the Australia v England Test Series. Warne took Aussie Nathan Hauritz and Aggers selected the Pom quick, Steven Finn. The loser was to take the winner for a meal at a restaurant of their choice. However once Hauritz was left out of the team for the First Test, Warne has apparently bailed on the bet.
Fair suck of the sav, Warnie. If you make a bet, you take the rough with the smooth and don't go changing conditions after the fact to suit yourself. By Warnie's apparent logic, you should be able to bet on a horse race but if your nag fails to get a good jump from the gate, you go and ask the bookie for your money back as your horse is now unlikely to win. Yeah. Like that's going to happen.
Come on, Warnie. Stop acting like an idiot and take it like a man rather than a whiny six-year old.
Here endeth the rant.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment